Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book.
|Published (Last):||9 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||9.60 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Akbar S Ahmed, Gellner's co-author, has also converted his work into a book in its own right Postmodernism and Islam, Routledge, pounds Gellner tells us that the publisher decided to publish the two books separately, and you can see why: they could hardly be more different.
God created two types of anthropologists. Those who collect butterflies and those who develop theories. Akbar Ahmed is a butterfly collector, Ernest Gellner is a theoretician par excellence. Their books illustrate the difference between an analytical mind at work and a mindless collection of anthropological and sociological facts. Gellner offers a razor-sharp analysis of 'three fundamental and irreducible positions' on faith: religious fundamentalism, postmodernism and his own stance, which he calls 'rationalist fundamentalism'.
Each position is carefully defined - postmodernism is pinned down as 'a kind of hysteria of subjectivity' - and dissected with a refreshing breath of knowledge and wisdom. Gellner's concern is to rescue 'serious knowledge' from the postmodernist and fundamentalist strait-jacket of absolute subjectivity. His 'mild', common-sense rationalism combines reason with virtue and presents a sagacious intellectual position that most sensible Muslims would be happy to endorse. In contrast, Ahmed offers a hodgepodge of half-related and unrelated facts united only by a keen preoccupation with the person of the author.
We begin with a breathless list of television appearances, radio discussions, newspaper interviews and audiences with celebrities, and proceed to a rambling rap of postmodern phenomena gleaned from newspaper clippings and video magazines. It is almost impossible to discern what Ahmed is trying to say. But what he does demonstrate quite satisfactorily is that he has little understanding of what constitutes postmodernism, and has an equally superficial appreciation of the world view, history and culture of Islam; a point amply illustrated by his description of the old-fashioned territorial dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan as 'a model postmodern phenomenon'].
The key insight of Ahmed's book is that Muslims, frustrated with modernity, are beginning to appreciate postmodernism because they are learning to laugh at themselves.
In case you have difficulty identifying Muslims, Ahmed authoritatively informs us, they are the ones who 'insist on wearing robes' while jeans are 'universally popular in the West'.
Beyond this cuckoo analysis, Ahmed the butterfly collector cannot resist the temptation to classify his collection of facts. It looks as if all the Muslim scholars of the world live in Britain; and all Muslim journals are published from here. Thus, Ahmed can acquire his collection of Muslim writers sitting comfortably in his armchair in Cambridge.
They are pigeon-holed as 'traditionalists', 'radicals' and 'modernists'. Unhappily, even a simple classification needs some mental legwork. Ahmed, ignoring the thoughts of most Muslim writers, manages to produce some strange bedfellows.
Thus Rana Kabbani, a committed Muslim, and Salman Rushdie, who has denounced Islam more than once, are both described as 'modernist Muslims'. The aggressively fundamentalist Kalim Siddiqui and the passive, anti-fundamentalist Parvez Manzoor are both described as 'radical Muslims'. The Sufi mystic Hossein Nasr and the late Fazlur Rahman, an assertively anti-mystic thinker, are both 'traditionalist Muslims'. Gellner produces a much neater, conceptual classification of the 'high' Islam of scholars and 'low Islam' of the people.
And neither of them, he shows, have anything to do with the real spirit of Islam. You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more.
Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles.
You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment. The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates. Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later?
Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile. Long reads. Coronavirus Advice. Lockdown Guide. UK Politics. Lib Dems. Green Party. Boris Johnson. Jeremy Corbyn. US Politics. Help The Hungry. Shappi Khorsandi.
Mary Dejevsky. Robert Fisk. Mark Steel. Janet Street-Porter. John Rentoul. Matthew Norman. Sean O'Grady. Tom Peck. Andrew Grice. Stop the Wildlife Trade. Rugby union. US sports. Miguel Delaney. Streaming Hub. Geoffrey Macnab. Clarisse Loughrey. Ed Cumming. Royal Family. Tech news. Tech culture. The Competition. Money transfers. Health insurance. Money Deals. Voucher Codes. Just Eat. National Trust. Climate Blogs. UK Edition. US Edition. Log in using your social network account. Please enter a valid password.
Keep me logged in. Want an ad-free experience? Subscribe to Independent Premium. View offers. Download the new Independent Premium app Sharing the full story, not just the headlines Download now. Comments Share your thoughts and debate the big issues. Join the discussion. Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
Create a commenting name to join the debate Submit. Please try again, the name must be unique Only letters and numbers accepted. Loading comments Please try again, the name must be unique. Cancel Post. There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts. Follow comments Enter your email to follow new comments on this article.
Thanks for subscribing!
Postmodernism, Reason and Religion